规格
| 服务器类型 | |
|---|---|
| 处理器 | |
| CPU | 4 @ 1996.248 MHz |
| 存储 | 313.9 GiB |
| 内存 | 7.8 GiB |
| 发行版 |
排名
| 指标 | 总体 | 等级 |
|---|---|---|
| 总体得分 | 前 36.46% | c |
| CPU | 前 40.69% | c |
| 磁盘 | 前 27.23% | c |
| 网络 | 前 39% | c |
| 评论 |
|
|
提交详情
| 用户名 | adns |
|---|---|
| 版本 | v2023-03-24 |
| 来源 | LowEndTalk |
| 推荐服务 | 不适用 |
| 服务费用 | 不适用 |
| 不适用 |
互联网服务提供商信息
| 互联网服务提供商 | |
|---|---|
| ASN | |
| 组织 | |
| 位置 | |
| 国家 |
磁盘速度测试
| 4K | 速度 | 每秒输入输出操作次数 (IOPS) |
|---|---|---|
| 阅读 | 114 MB/s | 29K/s |
| 撰写 | 114 MB/s | 29K/s |
| 总计 | 228 MB/s | 57K/s |
| 64K | 速度 | 每秒输入输出操作次数 (IOPS) |
| 阅读 | 1590 MB/s | 25K/s |
| 撰写 | 1600 MB/s | 25K/s |
| 总计 | 3190 MB/s | 50K/s |
| 512K | 速度 | 每秒输入输出操作次数 (IOPS) |
| 阅读 | 2620 MB/s | 5K/s |
| 撰写 | 2760 MB/s | 5K/s |
| 总计 | 5390 MB/s | 11K/s |
| 1M | 速度 | 每秒输入输出操作次数 (IOPS) |
| 阅读 | 2300 MB/s | 2K/s |
| 撰写 | 2450 MB/s | 2K/s |
| 总计 | 4750 MB/s | 5K/s |
Clouvider
London, UK (10G)
IPv4
985 Mbits/sec
1.60 Gbits/sec
Scaleway
Paris, FR (10G)
IPv4
busy
busy
NovoServe
North Holland, NL (40G)
IPv4
busy
2.38 Gbits/sec
Uztelecom
Tashkent, UZ (10G)
IPv4
992 Mbits/sec
1.90 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
NYC, NY, US (10G)
IPv4
1.66 Gbits/sec
179 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Dallas, TX, US (10G)
IPv4
1.09 Gbits/sec
busy
Clouvider
Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)
IPv4
116 Mbits/sec
336 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
London, UK (10G)
IPv6
1.41 Gbits/sec
135 Mbits/sec
Scaleway
Paris, FR (10G)
IPv6
2.28 Gbits/sec
2.30 Gbits/sec
NovoServe
North Holland, NL (40G)
IPv6
1.78 Gbits/sec
1.38 Gbits/sec
Uztelecom
Tashkent, UZ (10G)
IPv6
1.21 Gbits/sec
2.32 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
NYC, NY, US (10G)
IPv6
busy
busy
Clouvider
Dallas, TX, US (10G)
IPv6
898 Mbits/sec
397 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)
IPv6
898 Mbits/sec
busy
| 提供者 | 位置 | 协议 | 发送速度 | 接收速度 | Ping值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | IPv4 | 985 Mbits/sec | 1.60 Gbits/sec | 43.6 ms |
| Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | IPv4 | busy | busy | 18.3 ms |
| NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | IPv4 | busy | 2.38 Gbits/sec | 27.3 ms |
| Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | IPv4 | 992 Mbits/sec | 1.90 Mbits/sec | 185 ms |
| Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv4 | 1.66 Gbits/sec | 179 Mbits/sec | - |
| Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | IPv4 | 1.09 Gbits/sec | busy | 146 ms |
| Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | IPv4 | 116 Mbits/sec | 336 Mbits/sec | 172 ms |
| Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | IPv6 | 1.41 Gbits/sec | 135 Mbits/sec | 40.2 ms |
| Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | IPv6 | 2.28 Gbits/sec | 2.30 Gbits/sec | 38.4 ms |
| NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | IPv6 | 1.78 Gbits/sec | 1.38 Gbits/sec | 44.6 ms |
| Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | IPv6 | 1.21 Gbits/sec | 2.32 Mbits/sec | 185 ms |
| Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv6 | busy | busy | - |
| Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | IPv6 | 898 Mbits/sec | 397 Mbits/sec | 141 ms |
| Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | IPv6 | 898 Mbits/sec | busy | 199 ms |
原始基准测试报告(YABS)
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##</h1>
<h1>Yet-Another-Bench-Script</h1>
<h1>v2023-03-24</h1>
<h1><a href="https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script</a></h1>
<h1>## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##</h1>
<p>Sun Mar 26 18:16:16 CEST 2023</p>
<h2>Basic System Information:</h2>
<p>Uptime : 35 days, 21 hours, 51 minutes<br />
Processor : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor<br />
CPU cores : 4 @ 1996.248 MHz<br />
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled<br />
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled<br />
RAM : 7.8 GiB<br />
Swap : 0.0 KiB<br />
Disk : 313.9 GiB<br />
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)<br />
Kernel : 5.10.0-21-amd64<br />
VM Type : KVM<br />
Net Online : IPv4 & IPv6</p>
<h2>IPv6 Network Information:</h2>
<p>ISP : netcup GmbH<br />
ASN : AS197540 netcup GmbH<br />
Host : NETCUP-GMBH<br />
Location : Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg (BW)<br />
Country : Germany</p>
<h2>fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Block Size</th>
<th>4k (IOPS)</th>
<th>64k (IOPS)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Read</td>
<td>114.08 MB/s (28.5k)</td>
<td>1.59 GB/s (24.9k)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Write</td>
<td>114.38 MB/s (28.5k)</td>
<td>1.60 GB/s (25.0k)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total</td>
<td>228.47 MB/s (57.1k)</td>
<td>3.19 GB/s (49.9k)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Block Size</td>
<td>512k (IOPS)</td>
<td>1m (IOPS)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>------</td>
<td>--- ----</td>
<td>---- ----</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Read</td>
<td>2.62 GB/s (5.1k)</td>
<td>2.30 GB/s (2.2k)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Write</td>
<td>2.76 GB/s (5.4k)</td>
<td>2.45 GB/s (2.3k)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total</td>
<td>5.39 GB/s (10.5k)</td>
<td>4.75 GB/s (4.6k)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Location (Link)</th>
<th>Send Speed</th>
<th>Recv Speed</th>
<th>Ping</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>London, UK (10G)</td>
<td>985 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>1.60 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>43.6 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scaleway</td>
<td>Paris, FR (10G)</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>18.3 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NovoServe</td>
<td>North Holland, NL (40G)</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>2.38 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>27.3 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Uztelecom</td>
<td>Tashkent, UZ (10G)</td>
<td>992 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>1.90 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>185 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>NYC, NY, US (10G)</td>
<td>1.66 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>179 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>--</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>Dallas, TX, US (10G)</td>
<td>1.09 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>146 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)</td>
<td>116 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>336 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>172 ms</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Location (Link)</th>
<th>Send Speed</th>
<th>Recv Speed</th>
<th>Ping</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>London, UK (10G)</td>
<td>1.41 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>135 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>40.2 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scaleway</td>
<td>Paris, FR (10G)</td>
<td>2.28 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>2.30 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>38.4 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NovoServe</td>
<td>North Holland, NL (40G)</td>
<td>1.78 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>1.38 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>44.6 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Uztelecom</td>
<td>Tashkent, UZ (10G)</td>
<td>1.21 Gbits/sec</td>
<td>2.32 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>185 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>NYC, NY, US (10G)</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>--</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>Dallas, TX, US (10G)</td>
<td>898 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>397 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>141 ms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clouvider</td>
<td>Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)</td>
<td>898 Mbits/sec</td>
<td>busy</td>
<td>199 ms</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:</h2>
<p>Test | Value<br />
|<br />
Single Core | 1055<br />
Multi Core | 3142<br />
Full Test | <a href="https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/690001" rel="nofollow">https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/690001</a></p>
<p>YABS completed in 14 min 18 sec</p>
Netcup 的最新基准测试
| Date | User | Location | CPU | Storage | RAM | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | AMD EPYC-Genoa | 504 GiB | 8 GiB | ||||
| 04/18/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ | 126 GiB | 4 GiB | ||||
| 04/18/26 | Vienna, Austria | Neoverse-N1 | 39 GiB | 4 GiB | ||||
| 04/16/26 | Vienna, Austria | AMD EPYC 9645 96-Core | 504 GiB | 16 GiB | ||||
| 03/31/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | AMD EPYC 9645 96-Core | 252 GiB | 8 GiB | ||||
| 03/28/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ | 29 GiB | 1 GiB | ||||
| 01/29/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ | 29 GiB | 1 GiB | ||||
| 01/28/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ | 29 GiB | 1 GiB | ||||
| 01/28/26 | Nuremberg, Germany | QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ | 29 GiB | 1 GiB | ||||
| 01/28/26 | Vienna, Austria | AMD EPYC 9645 96-Core | 504 GiB | 12 GiB |