VPS / Cloud by Limewave
Specification
Server Type | |
---|---|
Processor | |
CPU | 2 @ 2394.230 MHz |
Storage | 49.8 GiB |
RAM | 31.4 GiB |
Distro | N/A |
Rankings
Metric | Overall | Grade |
---|---|---|
Overall Score | Top 89.24% | d |
CPU | Top 83.14% | d |
Disk | Top 72.78% | f |
Network | Top 78.56% | d |
Reviews |
Submitter
Username | pedagang |
---|---|
Version | v2022-11-22 |
Source | LowEndTalk |
Service Recommended | N/A |
Service Cost | N/A |
ISP Information
ISP | N/A |
---|---|
ASN | N/A |
Organization | N/A |
Location |
-, - (-) |
Country | N/A |
Disk Speed Tests
4K | Speed | IOPS |
---|---|---|
Read | 95 MB/s | 24K/s |
Write | 95 MB/s | 24K/s |
Total | 191 MB/s | 48K/s |
64K | Speed | IOPS |
Read | 262 MB/s | 4K/s |
Write | 263 MB/s | 4K/s |
Total | 526 MB/s | 8K/s |
512K | Speed | IOPS |
Read | 296 MB/s | 579/s |
Write | 312 MB/s | 610/s |
Total | 608 MB/s | 1K/s |
1M | Speed | IOPS |
Read | 356 MB/s | 348/s |
Write | 380 MB/s | 371/s |
Total | 737 MB/s | 719/s |
Clouvider
London, UK (10G)
391 Mbits/sec
92.8 Mbits/sec
Scaleway
Paris, FR (10G)
busy
busy
NovoServe
North Holland, NL (40G)
326 Mbits/sec
525 Mbits/sec
Uztelecom
Tashkent, UZ (10G)
237 Mbits/sec
51.7 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
NYC, NY, US (10G)
694 Mbits/sec
250 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Dallas, TX, US (10G)
758 Mbits/sec
257 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)
920 Mbits/sec
511 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
London, UK (10G)
299 Mbits/sec
69.0 Mbits/sec
Scaleway
Paris, FR (10G)
369 Mbits/sec
78.6 Mbits/sec
NovoServe
North Holland, NL (40G)
307 Mbits/sec
538 Mbits/sec
Uztelecom
Tashkent, UZ (10G)
162 Mbits/sec
56.5 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
NYC, NY, US (10G)
574 Mbits/sec
146 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Dallas, TX, US (10G)
718 Mbits/sec
369 Mbits/sec
Clouvider
Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)
858 Mbits/sec
497 Mbits/sec
Provider | Location | Send Speed | Receive Speed | Ping |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 391 Mbits/sec | 92.8 Mbits/sec | 127 ms |
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | busy | - |
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 326 Mbits/sec | 525 Mbits/sec | 133 ms |
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 237 Mbits/sec | 51.7 Mbits/sec | 244 ms |
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 694 Mbits/sec | 250 Mbits/sec | 58.5 ms |
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 758 Mbits/sec | 257 Mbits/sec | 55.1 ms |
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 920 Mbits/sec | 511 Mbits/sec | 31.9 ms |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 299 Mbits/sec | 69.0 Mbits/sec | 126 ms |
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 369 Mbits/sec | 78.6 Mbits/sec | 137 ms |
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 307 Mbits/sec | 538 Mbits/sec | 132 ms |
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 162 Mbits/sec | 56.5 Mbits/sec | 243 ms |
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 574 Mbits/sec | 146 Mbits/sec | 57.1 ms |
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 718 Mbits/sec | 369 Mbits/sec | 54.0 ms |
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 858 Mbits/sec | 497 Mbits/sec | 29.0 ms |
Raw Benchmark Report (YABS)
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##</h1></div> <h1>Yet-Another-Bench-Script</h1> <h1>v2022-11-22</h1> <h1><a href="https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script</a></h1> <h1>## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##</h1> <p>Sat 26 Nov 2022 12:01:57 AM EST</p> <h2>Basic System Information:</h2> <p>Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 15 minutes<br /> Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz<br /> CPU cores : 2 @ 2394.230 MHz<br /> AES-NI : ✔ Enabled<br /> VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled<br /> RAM : 31.4 GiB<br /> Swap : 0.0 KiB<br /> Disk : 49.8 GiB<br /> Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)<br /> Kernel : 5.10.0-8-amd64</p> <h2>fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):</h2> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Block Size</th> <th>4k (IOPS)</th> <th>64k (IOPS)</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Read</td> <td>95.61 MB/s (23.9k)</td> <td>262.47 MB/s (4.1k)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Write</td> <td>95.86 MB/s (23.9k)</td> <td>263.85 MB/s (4.1k)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total</td> <td>191.47 MB/s (47.8k)</td> <td>526.32 MB/s (8.2k)</td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Block Size</td> <td>512k (IOPS)</td> <td>1m (IOPS)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>------</td> <td>--- ----</td> <td>---- ----</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Read</td> <td>296.58 MB/s (579)</td> <td>356.62 MB/s (348)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Write</td> <td>312.34 MB/s (610)</td> <td>380.37 MB/s (371)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total</td> <td>608.92 MB/s (1.1k)</td> <td>737.00 MB/s (719)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):</h2> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Provider</th> <th>Location (Link)</th> <th>Send Speed</th> <th>Recv Speed</th> <th>Ping</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>London, UK (10G)</td> <td>391 Mbits/sec</td> <td>92.8 Mbits/sec</td> <td>127 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Scaleway</td> <td>Paris, FR (10G)</td> <td>busy</td> <td>busy</td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td>NovoServe</td> <td>North Holland, NL (40G)</td> <td>326 Mbits/sec</td> <td>525 Mbits/sec</td> <td>133 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Uztelecom</td> <td>Tashkent, UZ (10G)</td> <td>237 Mbits/sec</td> <td>51.7 Mbits/sec</td> <td>244 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>NYC, NY, US (10G)</td> <td>694 Mbits/sec</td> <td>250 Mbits/sec</td> <td>58.5 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>Dallas, TX, US (10G)</td> <td>758 Mbits/sec</td> <td>257 Mbits/sec</td> <td>55.1 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)</td> <td>920 Mbits/sec</td> <td>511 Mbits/sec</td> <td>31.9 ms</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):</h2> <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Provider</th> <th>Location (Link)</th> <th>Send Speed</th> <th>Recv Speed</th> <th>Ping</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>London, UK (10G)</td> <td>299 Mbits/sec</td> <td>69.0 Mbits/sec</td> <td>126 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Scaleway</td> <td>Paris, FR (10G)</td> <td>369 Mbits/sec</td> <td>78.6 Mbits/sec</td> <td>137 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NovoServe</td> <td>North Holland, NL (40G)</td> <td>307 Mbits/sec</td> <td>538 Mbits/sec</td> <td>132 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Uztelecom</td> <td>Tashkent, UZ (10G)</td> <td>162 Mbits/sec</td> <td>56.5 Mbits/sec</td> <td>243 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>NYC, NY, US (10G)</td> <td>574 Mbits/sec</td> <td>146 Mbits/sec</td> <td>57.1 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>Dallas, TX, US (10G)</td> <td>718 Mbits/sec</td> <td>369 Mbits/sec</td> <td>54.0 ms</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Clouvider</td> <td>Los Angeles, CA, US (10G)</td> <td>858 Mbits/sec</td> <td>497 Mbits/sec</td> <td>29.0 ms</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:</h2> <p>Test | Value<br /> |<br /> Single Core | 485<br /> Multi Core | 949<br /> Full Test | <a href="https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18883985" rel="nofollow">https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18883985</a></p>
Limewave's Latest Benchmarks
Date | User | Location | CPU | Storage | RAM | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/02/24 | Seattle, United States | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 15 GiB | 1 GiB | |||
07/01/23 | Beauharnois, Canada | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 20 GiB | 4 GiB | |||
01/21/23 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 49 GiB | 32 GiB | |||
12/05/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 98 GiB | 16 GiB | |||
12/01/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 98 GiB | 16 GiB | |||
11/26/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 50 GiB | 32 GiB | |||
11/04/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 46 GiB | 4 GiB | |||
11/02/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 50 GiB | 4 GiB | |||
10/20/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 25 GiB | 4 GiB | |||
10/14/22 | N/A | Intel Xeon CPU E5-2695 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 25 GiB | 4 GiB |